Implications of falsification theory and the constructivism paradigm in the development of science education and learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56724/etude.v4i1.257Keywords:
Falsification theory, Constructivism paradigm, Science education, Science learningAbstract
Background: Science learning holds paramount significance in the advancement of science and technology. Two pivotal theories, falsification theory and the constructivism paradigm, profoundly influence the landscape of science education.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of falsification theory and the constructivism paradigm on the development of science learning. Falsification theory, pioneered by Karl Popper, underscores the necessity of rigorous testing and validation of scientific hypotheses, forming the bedrock for the evolution of scientific knowledge. Conversely, the constructivism paradigm accentuates the active role individuals play in constructing knowledge, emphasizing a student-centered approach that involves collaborative learning, and problem-solving.
Design and methods: In this study, we delve into the implications of falsification theory and the constructivism paradigm in shaping science education. Falsification theory advocates for empirical proof and stringent testing of scientific hypotheses, while the constructivism paradigm promotes active student involvement in building their comprehension of scientific concepts. The study investigates how the integration of these two approaches can foster robust science learning environments, encouraging critical thinking, exploration, and profound understanding.
Results: The synthesis of falsification theory and the constructivism paradigm in science learning holds promise for cultivating a rich educational experience. By finding a delicate balance between rigorous empirical testing and providing opportunities for active student engagement, educators can create a profound and meaningful learning journey for students. This integrated approach not only instills an appreciation for the scientific method but also nurtures a deep understanding of science concepts, ultimately shaping students into critical thinkers with a genuine enthusiasm for scientific exploration.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akhmad Habibi, Yasir Riady, Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan & Nour Awni Albelbisi. (2022). Beliefs and Knowledge for Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Integration during Teaching Practice: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior, 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2124752
Astuti, E. T. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan Sebagai Arah Pengembangan Berpikir Yang Konstruktif: Telaah Pemikiran Pragmatis Charles S. Peirce Dan Kontribusinya Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Pendidikan Dasar Islam. At-Tajdid: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah, 9(1), 1-16.
Ausat, A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can Chat GPT Replace the Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A Fundamental Analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16100-16106. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2745
Ausat, A. M. A., Azzaakiyyah, H. K., Permana, R. M., Riady, Y., & Suherlan, S. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Enabling MSMEs to Compete in the Digital Age. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i2.346
Barlia, L. (2011). Konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains di SD: tinjauan epistemologi, ontologi, dan keraguan dalam praksisnya. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3).
Habibah, S. (2019). Paradigma popperian. Dar el-Ilmi: jurnal studi keagamaan, pendidikan dan humaniora, 6(2), 303-318.
Harahap, M. A. K., Almaududi Ausat, A. M., Rachman, A., Riady, Y., & Azzaakiyyah, H. K. (2023). Overview of ChatGPT Technology and its Potential in Improving Tourism Information Services. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i2.12416
Harahap, R., Hasibuan, A. T., Sirait, S., Yuliawati, F., & Lubis, N. (2019). Teori Falsifikasi Karl Raimund Popper dan Kontribusinya Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Bagi Siswa Usia Dasar. MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keislaman, 10(2), 166-185.
Kusumaningpuri, A. R., & Fauziati, E. (2021). Model pembelajaran RADEC dalam perspektif filsafat konstruktivisme Vygotsky. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 103-111.
Muthmainnah, L. (2018). Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Epistemologi Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Jurnal Filsafat, 28(1), 74-91.
Riady, Y. (2021). Perilaku Pencarian Informasi dan Literasi Kesehatan Digital Mahasiswa Universitas Terbuka yang Terpapar Covid-19. IKOMIK: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Informasi, 1(2), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.33830/ikomik.v1i2.2046
Riady, Y. (2013). Perilaku pencarian informasi mahasiswa program doktoral dalam penyusunan disertasi. VISI PUSTAKA: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan, 15(2), 107–114.
Riady, Y., Sofwan, M., Mailizar, M., Alqahtani, T. M., Yaqin, L. N., & Habibi, A. (2023). How can we assess the success of information technologies in digital libraries? Empirical evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100192
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Megawati, Yasir Riady, Firman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to Copyright notice.