The analysis of figurative language in Bohemian Rhapsody’s lyric by  Queen

Octa Pratama Putra; Herlin Widasiwi Setianingrum; Sufi Alawiyah; Fitriyah; Juniato

doi:10.56724/ladu.v1i1.10

Authors

Octa Pratama Putra Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Herlin Widasiwi Setianingrum Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Sufi Alawiyah Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Fitriyah Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Juniato Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56724/ladu.v1i1.10

Keywords:

figurative language, lyric, bohemian rhapsody

Abstract

Background: Throughout the lyric, -from music- there must be emblazoning with the meaning within it.

Purpose: This study is coincided in seeking out the use of figurative language’s content in Bohemian Rhapsody’s lyric by Queen.

Design and methods: Whereupon, the qualitative approach with design of content analysis is used in this study. The researcher acts as the main instrument since analyzing it. The focus on this study shows twenty figurative languages usage in it. The entire data is analyzed through three stages; 1). Data reduction, 2). Data representation, 3). Conclusion.

Results: The result of this study shows there are 20 kinds of figurative languages; they are; Alliteration (3 lines), assonance and consonance (1 line), Hyperbole (1 line), Imagery (2 lines), Internal rhyme (1 line), Irony (1 line), metaphor (2 lines), and Onomatopoeia (1 line) Personification (1 line), Repetition (1 line), Simile (1 line), and symbolism (two lines). The researcher concludes, the figurative language used by this lyric is to bring the meaning coming up with beautiful language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abrams, M. . (2009). A Glossary of the Literary Terms. In A Glossary of the Literary Terms (9th ed.). Michael Rosenberg.

Alice Deignan, Jeanette Littlemore, and E. S. (2013). The Figurative Language, Genre, and Register (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Balla, B. (2012). Symbolism, Syntesia, and Semiotic; In Multidisciplinary Approach (1st ed., p. 19). Xlibirs Corporation.

Brester, S. (2008). The Lyric (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis Group.

Conston, R. W. G. & H. L. (2012). The Interpretation of Figurative Language (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Heitman, J. (2007). The Daily Warm-Up. In The Figurative Language (p. 35). Mark Twain Media, Inc.

Kopka, D. (2016). The Instant Activity. In The Figurative Language (p. 15). Milliken Publishing Company.

Mar, D. (1842). Grammar of the English as the Language. In Del Mar’s English Grammar (p. 113). Late Baldwin and Cradock.

McKenzie, P. W. (2016). The Interactive Notebook. In The Language Art (p. 66). Carson-Dellos Publishing.

Myers, R. . (2016a). The Figure of Speech. In Idiom and Alliteration (1st ed., p. 21).

Lorenz Educational Press.

Myers, R. . (2016b). The Figure of Speech. In Personification, Paradox, and Irony (p. 37). Lorenz Educational Press.

Nickelsen, L. (2001). The Easy and Effective Mini Lesson of Enriching and Enliving the Writing. In Teaching Elaboration and the Word Choices (1st ed., p. 14). The Scholastic.

Pramudya, A. A. (2018). The Meaning of Freddie Mercury’s “Bohemian Rhapsody” A Study Of Deconstruction.

Ritchie, L. D. (2013). Metaphor. In Key Topics in Semantic and Pragmatic (2nd ed., p. 8). Press, Cambridge University