Effectiveness Evaluation of the Student Research Proposal Presentation Program at Scientific Writing Course

Authors

  • Kasmanah Kasmanah Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Muchlas Suseno Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Samsi Setiadi Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56724/ladu.v4i4.279

Keywords:

language program evaluation, language program effectiveness, CIPP, research proposal presentation

Abstract

Higher education increasingly emphasizes the importance of developing students' academic and professional abilities, including scientific communication and presentation skills. The research proposal presentation program is a strategic initiative in responding to these needs, but challenges in its implementation still exist. Evaluate the effectiveness of student research proposal presentation programs in the Scientific Writing course at UNINDRA and identify strengths and weaknesses in the delivery of material and student argumentation structure. Evaluative research involves collecting data from the results of presentation evaluations, feedback from lecturers or other participants, and assessing the quality of presentations. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques were used, with thematic analysis techniques to identify patterns or themes in participant feedback and evaluation. The evaluation showed that the research proposal presentation program provided significant benefits for lecturers and students. However, there are challenges in the learning process due to inadequate support in CPMK and material distribution. The high lecturer-student ratio also hinders the implementation of the ideal presentation. Internal obstacles such as lack of courage and suboptimal preparation of presentation materials also affect the quality of presentations. The need for adjustments in the preparation of the curriculum and teaching methods, including aligning the CPMK with the CPL and ensuring that the plan for the presentation of research proposals is included in the RPS. It is necessary to provide adequate time and improvement of presentation equipment to improve the quality of presentation and feedback. Better integration between CPMK and CPL will create a globally competitive generation of academics and professionals. Thus, this program can be more effective in achieving higher education goals in developing students' academic and professional abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Altinay, L., & Paraskevas, A. (2008). Menulis proposal penelitian Anda. Di Merencanakan Penelitian di Perhotelan &; Pariwisata (hlm. 136–154). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8110-0.50010-7

Aqeel, Z. A., & Chung, KC (2024). Strategi untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berbicara di Depan Umum. Bedah Plastik dan Rekonstruksi, 153(2), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000011033

Aryana, S., Burhanudin, M., Fauziya, D. S., & Wagiran, W. (2022). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) (Evaluasi Pembelajaran Online Kursus Bahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP)). Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 425. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v7i2.10284

Ashiq, AS, Abbas, N., Andleeb, S., & Abbas, A. (2020). Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Pengembangan Kompetensi Umum untuk Pasar Kerja: Persepsi Lulusan Universitas. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan di Negara Berkembang, 6(4), 1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v6i4.1457

Bacus, RC, Dayagbil, FT, Monacillo, V. F., & Bustos, RT (2022). Pengajaran Jarak Jauh Darurat Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi di Tengah Pandemi. Jurnal Internasional Teknologi Informasi dan Pendidikan, 12(8), 762–771. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.8.1682

Daniels, J. (2017). Pembelajaran profesional di pendidikan tinggi: membuat praktik yang baik relevan. Jurnal Internasional untuk Pengembangan Akademik, 22(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1261352

DeCoito, I., & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Pengajaran online selama pandemi COVID-19: menjelajahi kurikulum dan praktik penilaian guru sains/STEM di Kanada. Penelitian Pendidikan Sains Disiplin dan Interdisipliner, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00048-z

Du, Z. (2023). Model CIPP Penelitian Terapan dalam Evaluasi Online Pengajaran Online Pemasaran Internet. Kurikulum dan Metodologi Pengajaran, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2023.061115

Houp, KW (1980). Melaporkan Informasi Teknis. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB14520655

Kurzweil, D., Meyer, E. G., Marcellas, K., & Henry, B. (2020). Pedoman berbasis bukti untuk merekam kuliah berbasis slide. Pendidik Ilmu Kedokteran, 30(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01032-w

Lutfi, L., Susesno, M., & Setiadi, S. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia di Masa Pandemik Pada Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v4i2.3319

Munawar, M., Suciati, S., Saputro, B. A., & Luthfy, P. A. (2023). Evaluasi Program Literasi Digital di PAUD Melalui Robokids STEAM Coding Game. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 1846–1867. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i2.4151

Pitaloka, LD, Suherman, S., & ... (2023). Strategi Pembelajaran Public Speaking Untuk Meningkatkan Rasa Percaya Diri Warga Belajar. Jambura Jurnal .... https://ejournal-fip-ung.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jjce/article/view/2765

Ramdan, V. (2017). Pengaruh Penguasaan Kosakata dan Tata Bahasa terhadap Pemahaman Membaca Teks Narasi Bahasa Inggris. DEIKSIS, 9(02), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v9i02.1299

Sankaran, S., & Saad, N. (2022). Mengevaluasi program Sarjana Pendidikan berdasarkan konteks, masukan, proses, dan model produk. Perbatasan dalam Pendidikan, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924374

Setiawan, M. A., Sari, N. P., Makaria, E. C., Dinanty, N. S., & Rahman, G. (2024). Peningkatan kualitas bimbingan dan konseling di SMK: pengujian efektivitas instrumen evaluasi berbasis model CIPP. PAEDAGOGIA, 27(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v27i1.84673

Shasrini, T., Samsudin, D., & Pahlawan, E. (2022). KOMPETENSI KOMUNIKASI GURU DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. ... Jurnal Hasana. https://nusantarahasanajournal.com/index.php/nhj/article/view/383

Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). Model CIPP : Aplikasi dalam Evaluasi Program Bahasa. Jurnal AsiaTEFL. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360

Wadu, D. I., & Ismanto, B. (2021). Model evaluasi CIPP - Kesepakatan lima menteri: Mengatur dan mengatur guru sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i2.43730

Wedayanthi, L. M. D., Pradnyana, P. B., & Adiwijaya, P. A. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI CIPP SEBAGAI MODEL EVALUASI ASISTENSI MENGAJAR DI SD BALI BILINGUAL SCHOOL SEBAGAI PRAKTIK KURIKULUM MERDEKA. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 16(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v16i1.59591

Yanna, S., & Niesa, C. (2022). Pelatihan Pembuatan Slide Presentasi Power Point Secara Interaktif. ... Jurnal Keterlibatan Masyarakat .... http://journal.umuslim.ac.id/index.php/ajce/article/view/1401

Downloads

Published

2024-07-14

How to Cite

Kasmanah, K., Suseno, M., & Setiadi, S. (2024). Effectiveness Evaluation of the Student Research Proposal Presentation Program at Scientific Writing Course. LADU: Journal of Languages and Education, 4(4), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.56724/ladu.v4i4.279

Issue

Section

Articles